High-speed highways don’t just facilitate transport and mobility. They can cut through communities, disadvantage people and arouse false hopes. A team of social anthropologists have been studying China’s massive Silk Road project.
Text: Michael T. Ganz
Translation by Paul Day
Shepherds on the road
Are the shepherds damaging the highway, or is the highway damaging the shepherds? Who does a road belong to anyway? Who does it help, and who does it hinder? They’re all questions that the five-member team headed by Professor Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi set out to address. The project is entitled “ Roadwork: An Anthropology of Infrastructure at China’s Inner Asian Borders ”, and is being conducted under the auspices of UZH’s Department of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies.
That social anthropologists should be concerning themselves with the nature and the impact of asphalt traffic routes is a new and surprising development. “We’re trying to understand what a road does,” Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi explains. “Who it connects, who it excludes, what relations it enables and what relations it destroys.” Her fellow team member, post-doc Emilia Sulek, expands: “Roads are everywhere. But we only tend to think about them when they don’t do what they’re supposed to.”
This is why the research team has chosen the controversial Belt and Road Initiative as the subject of its studies. The program is intended to achieve Chinese President Xi Jinping’s aim of connecting his country with other parts of Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa. The initiative has two components: The Maritime Silk Road, which comprises a number of sea routes, and the new overland routes of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The latter, which are a series of rail lines, roads and gas and oil pipelines, run through Northwest China, or more precisely the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, an area some 40 times the size of Switzerland but with only about two-and-a-half times as many inhabitants. Xinjiang borders no fewer than eight other countries, and is considered a vital but sensitive region in geopolitical terms.
A Chinese prestige project
The Belt and Road Initiative is China’s big prestige project, designed – in the words of President Xi Jinping – to “promote peace and friendship at home and abroad.” Joniak-Lüthi and Sulek have their reservations here. “In all the discourse around the New Silk Road, the voice of the Chinese government is always louder than those of all the other players,” Emilia Sulek observes. Smaller and poorer nations such as Laos, Nepal and Kyrgyzstan, which are all affected by China’s transport plans, have had no choice but to accede to the new highways’ construction.
Their scope for negotiation on the corresponding construction contracts and loan interest rates is similarly limited. For all the claims of its promoting friendship and peace, the new road will primarily benefit the urban centers, where most capital is already clearly concentrated. The vast rural areas between them will hardly benefit at all. As the example of Highway G30 illustrates, the roadsides have lost their function as a source of income for the local populations, and the state-owned highway service centers sell brought-in Chinese factory products instead.
“Infrastructure should not be viewed in terms of its function alone,” Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi explains. “A transport network like the New Silk Road is sending a political and an economic message, too: Superpower China is seeking to connect. Ultimately, the Belt and Road Initiative is primarily a political affair.” Major road projects are born on a drawing board: Lines on a map, drawn by politicians with little regard for local realities and then cast in asphalt by engineers and construction teams. That they will then gradually deteriorate and need maintenance and care seems to be of little relevance to their planners, as long as the prestige project they embody can have its desired political effect.
For a telling example of the phenomenon, Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi and her team have been monitoring the fate of a 450-kilometer stretch of the new highway through the desert plains of Xinjiang which is one of the key parts of the New Silk Road network. A caravan route had been established here by as early as the Chinese Han dynasty (202 BCE to 220 AD), following the course of the Tarim River that is so vital to the region. For centuries the local populations and political powers clashed over the maintenance of the route, which was harshly exposed to the winds, sand and heat.
In the early 2010s, the Chinese government asphalted the problem section throughout – for the second time in just ten years. The new Highway 218 is only seven meters wide, two-lane and hardly protected at all from the local wind and sand. Around 3,000 trucks and articulated lorries use the road every day, a higher heavy-vehicle volume than the St. Gotthard route. Xi Jinping’s engineers had reckoned without the climate, though. Nor had they considered that the trees which had always fringed the Tarim River and which anchored the earth and protected the earlier route from the wind and the sun were now no longer there: With the river’s waters diverted for use in agricultural and energy projects, the forestry on its banks had died.
The result: Sand now laps over Highway 218 once again, and the searing heat and the salt in the sand are burning holes in the poor-quality asphalt – poor-quality because part of the funds which the government had assigned to the road’s construction ended up in the pockets of local rulers and suppliers, if the villagers of the region are to be believed. “One researcher in Xinjiang told me that each kilometer of Highway 218 has a different asphalt mix,” says Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi. “And he was only half-joking.”
China’s border regions are dotted with half-finished projects: Entire planned villages that have never been inhabited, industrial premises left unused, museums devoid of a single exhibit. Joniak-Lüthi and Sulek fear that the New Silk Road could suffer a similar fate if the Belt and Road Initiative should lose momentum or its political message lose appeal. Not so the massive debts, however, which the neighboring countries are running up with China through the new road’s construction: They will be carried and felt for decades to come.
In the case of Highway 218, the Chinese government has at least acknowledged the problem, and is currently investing the equivalent of some CHF 1.5 billion in rewatering the Tarim River along the road’s problematic desert section. To do so, it has ordered the construction of a system that pipes water from Bosten Lake in the north to the river’s dried-up lower courses. The ecologically important forestry has somewhat recovered as a result. But since the provision of the new piping system, the level of Bosten Lake has been steadily falling, and the lake is now likely to be entirely dry by 2030. So how long will the New Silk Road still be with us?
Water, forest and asphalt; shepherds, traders and engineers; government programs, economic policies and corruption: All these factors, interests and conflicts flow together along roads like Northwest China’s Highways G30 and 218. So the political and societal ramifications of all this swift and technocratic roadbuilding are a highly contentious issue. It’s the same story in Africa, where China is also investing billions in new trunk transport routes, not least to connect the mines it manages with the key commercial ports. “Roads,” Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi concludes, “are a projection of so much else that colors our lives. And that’s what makes them so fascinating.”
Michael T. Ganz is a freelance journalist.
Social anthropology is no deskbound pursuit. The five researchers in the Swiss National Science Foundation’s “ Roadwork” project have been travelling Asia for over 20 years now, spending around a third of their research time in their study region. Interviews are the bread and butter of any social anthropologist’s work. “We talk to shepherds and government officials, to kiosk owners and truck drivers… to everyone who’s involved with the region’s roads,” says Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi. The five researchers pool all their experiences – a somewhat unusual practice among social anthropologists, for whom ethnological field research tends to be more of a solo activity. But Joniak-Lüthi and Sulek also see the Roadwork project as a way to establish a more team-minded approach within their specialist field. What is most unusual about Roadwork, though, is the subject of its research: Infrastructure. New roads and railways hold the potential for change. The question is always: Will those changes be in the desired direction? “With our research we’re seeking to acquire a knowledge of how we can build better roads – roads that are sustainable in both economic and social terms,” concludes Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi. “And to understand when it would be better not to build a road at all.”